Orton Gillingham Pros And Cons

There are many different approaches to teaching reading, and the Orton Gillingham approach is one of the most popular. This approach is based on the theory that dyslexia is a neurological disorder that affects the way the brain processes information. The Orton Gillingham approach uses a multisensory approach to teaching reading, which means that it uses a combination of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic methods.

This approach has been shown to be effective for many students with dyslexia, but it is not without its drawbacks.

If you are looking for a new reading program to help your child improve their skills, you may be wondering if Orton Gillingham is the right fit. This approach has been around for over 80 years and is based on the work of Samuel Orton and Anna Gillingham. It is a highly structured, multisensory approach that can be very effective for some children.

However, it is important to understand both the pros and cons of this approach before making a decision. PROS: One of the biggest advantages of Orton Gillingham is that it is extremely systematic.

This can be helpful for children who need a lot of structure in their learning. The program also uses multiple senses, which can be beneficial for kids who learn best when they are able to see, hear, and feel what they are learning. Additionally, because it is such a comprehensive program, it can address all areas of reading including phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension.

CONS: One potential downside of Orton Gillingham is that it can be quite time-consuming. If you are already working with your child on other academic subjects or extracurricular activities, adding in this program could mean even more hours spent on schoolwork each day.

Additionally, because it relies heavily on rote memorization, some children may find it boring or tedious. Finally, because Orton Gillingham programs must be individually created for each child based on their specific needs, they can be quite expensive.

Is Orton-Gillingham Good for All Students?

Orton-Gillingham is a highly structured, sequential, and individualized approach to teaching reading that was originally developed for use with students who have dyslexia. However, Orton-Gillingham can be beneficial for all students, especially those who are struggling with reading. Orton-Gillingham instruction is based on the understanding that reading difficulties are caused by a deficiency in the phonemic awareness, phonology, and/or orthography (the rules of spelling) component of language.

This instruction focuses on correcting these underlying deficits so that students can learn to read accurately and fluently. One of the benefits of Orton-Gillingham instruction is that it is highly explicit and systematic. This means that teachers provide clear explanations of concepts and skills as they are introduced, and then provide ample opportunity for students to practice these skills.

This kind of explicit instruction is especially important for struggling readers, who may need extra support in order to understand new concepts. Another benefit of Orton-Gillingham instruction is that it is Individualized. This means that each student’s program is specifically tailored to their needs.

For example, a student who struggles with phonemic awareness might receive different instructions than a student who struggles with orthography. This individualization ensures that each student gets the specific help they need in order to improve their reading skills. Overall, Orton-Gillingham instruction can be extremely beneficial for all students, but especially those who are struggling with reading.

Is Orton-Gillingham Effective?

Yes, the Orton-Gillingham approach is an effective method for teaching reading and spelling to individuals with dyslexia. This research-based approach uses a multisensory approach to instruction, incorporating visual, auditory, and kinesthetic/tactile modalities to engage learners and support their success. The Orton-Gillingham approach has been shown to be an effective intervention for dyslexia, helping individuals improve their reading and spelling skills.

Is Orton-Gillingham Training Worth It?

Orton-Gillingham (OG) is a multi-sensory, structured, sequential approach to teaching reading and spelling. It was developed in the 1930s by Dr. Samuel Orton, a neuropsychiatrist, and Anna Gillingham, an educator. The OG approach has been shown to be effective for individuals with dyslexia and other reading disabilities.

There are many different programs that use the Orton-Gillingham approach. Some are designed for classroom use, while others are geared towards one-on-one tutoring. Many OG programs are expensive and require certification to administer; however, there are also some free or low-cost options available.

So, is Orton-Gillingham training worth it? The answer may depend on your situation. If you have a child with dyslexia or another reading disability, OG can be an effective way to help them improve their reading skills.

However, it’s important to keep in mind that not all children will respond equally well to this type of instruction – some may benefit more from other approaches such as phonics instruction or Reading Recovery. And while OG can be helpful for struggling readers, it’s important to remember that there is no “cure” for dyslexia; rather, it’s a lifelong condition that requires ongoing support and accommodations.

What are the Benefits of Orton-Gillingham?

Orton-Gillingham is a highly effective, research-based approach to teaching reading, spelling, and writing to individuals with dyslexia or other language-based learning disabilities. The Orton-Gillingham approach is multisensory, meaning it engages all of the senses in learning. This makes it an especially powerful tool for helping children with dyslexia, as they often have difficulty processing information from one sense (usually vision) on its own.

There are many benefits of using the Orton-Gillingham approach with children who have dyslexia or other language-based learning disabilities. First and foremost, it is an evidence-based approach that has been shown to be effective in numerous studies. Additionally, the Orton-Gillingham approach is individualized to meet the needs of each child, as it recognizes that every child learns differently.

Finally, the Orton-Gillingham approach is also highly engaging and motivating for children, as it uses a variety of activities and materials to keep them engaged in learning. If you are a parent or educator of a child with dyslexia or another language-based learning disability, I encourage you to learn more about the Orton-Gillingham approach and consider using it with your child. It has helped countless children improve their reading, spelling, and writing skills – there’s no reason why it can’t help your child too!

Orton-Gillingham Criticism

The Orton-Gillingham approach to reading instruction has been criticized by some for being too expensive and time-consuming. Others have argued that the approach is not effective for all students, especially those with learning disabilities.

Orton-Gillingham Does Not Work

There are a lot of different reading programs out there. Some use phonics, some use whole language, and some use a mix of both. The Orton-Gillingham program is one that uses phonics to teach reading.

This program was developed in the 1930s by two people named Orton and Gillingham. It is still used today by some teachers and parents who believe that it is the best way to teach reading. However, there is no scientific evidence that Orton-Gillingham actually works.

In fact, studies have shown that this program is no more effective than any other phonics-based program. So why do some people continue to use it? Probably because they don’t know any better.

There are a lot of myths about reading instruction, and Orton-Gillingham is just one of them.

Orton-Gillingham Success Rate

Orton-Gillingham is a highly effective, research-based approach to teaching reading, spelling and writing to individuals with dyslexia. The Orton-Gillingham approach is based on the understanding that dyslexia is a neurological disorder that affects the way the brain processes written language. The Orton-Gillingham approach has been shown to be an effective intervention for individuals with dyslexia.

A number of studies have found that the Orton-Gillingham approach can significantly improve reading skills in individuals with dyslexia. In one study, 72% of students who received Orton-Gillingham instruction showed significant improvements in reading skills. The Orton-Gillingham approach is individualized, intensive and structured.

It uses a multisensory approach to teaching, which means that it engages all learning modalities (visual, auditory, kinesthetic/tactile). The Orton-Gillingham approach is also sequential and cumulative, meaning that new concepts are built upon previous ones. One of the key features of the Orton-Gillingham approach is its explicitness.

Concepts are taught directly and explicitly through verbal explanation, modeling and demonstration. This helps ensure that students understand what they are learning and can apply it to reading, spelling and writing tasks. The Orton-Gillingham approach has been used for over 80 years and has been proven to be an effective intervention for individuals with dyslexia.

If you are looking for an evidence-based intervention for someone with dyslexia, the Orton-Gillinghamapproach may be right for you!

Conclusion

If you’re looking into Orton Gillingham (OG) for your child with dyslexia, you may be wondering about the pros and cons. Here’s a quick rundown of some of the key points to consider. PROS:

– OG is an evidence-based approach that has been shown to be effective for many children with dyslexia. – It is highly structured and systematic, which can provide a much-needed sense of predictability and control for kids who often feel overwhelmed by their reading struggles. – OG instruction is very individualized, so it can be tailored to meet each child’s specific needs.

CONS: – Because it is so specialized, OG can be expensive and hard to find instructors qualified to teach it. – It can also be quite time-consuming, so it may not be feasible for families with busy schedules.